From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 19, 2010
No. CIV S-06-2557 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2557 FCD EFB P.

July 19, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 5, 2009, the court stayed discovery as to defendants Carey and Ballesteros pending resolution of their motion to dismiss. Dckt. No. 44. On April 23, 2009, the court also stayed the dispositive motion deadline pending resolution of the motion. Dckt. No. 47. As the motion is now resolved, the court modifies the October 17, 2008 discovery and scheduling order as follows:

1. Plaintiff and defendant Ballesteros may conduct discovery until October 15, 2010. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 31, 33, 34, or 36 shall be served not later than August 20, 2010.

2. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before January 14, 2010. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of the order filed June 11, 2008.

3. The court will schedule pretrial proceedings, if necessary, upon the resolution of any pretrial motions filed. Requests to modify this schedule will be looked upon with disfavor and must be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b).

So ordered.


Summaries of

Morrison v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 19, 2010
No. CIV S-06-2557 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Morrison v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS LEE MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2557 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)