From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1989
146 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 23, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Conflicting evidence was adduced at the hearing as to when the summonses and complaints were served. The respondents met their burden of proving that process was served more than three years after the injury on which the action is premised (Martin v Edwards Labs., 60 N.Y.2d 417, 428; Connell v Hayden, 83 A.D.2d 30, 39) and we discern no basis for disturbing the Supreme Court's resolution of this factual question in their favor (see, Weber v State of New York, 107 A.D.2d 929; Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Arrao, 100 A.D.2d 949). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morris v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 1989
146 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Morris v. Weeks

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE MORRIS et al., Appellants, v. JAMES WEEKS et al., Respondents, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)