From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Newberry Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 24, 2014
Case No. 11-cv-10938 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 24, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-10938

11-24-2014

MUNCEY MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. NEWBERRY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Steven Whalen

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On March 9, 2011, Plaintiff Muncey Morris filed a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint against Defendants. Specifically, Morris alleged that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In his complaint, Morris had named 32 Defendants; 19 of these Defendants have been dismissed.

There are thirteen remaining Defendants. These have not yet been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). On October 31, 2014, Magistrate Judge Steven Whalen issued a report recommending that Morris's Amendment Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Rep. & Rec. 4, ECF No. 109. Magistrate Judge Whalen stated that, not only had Morris not served twelve Defendants, he had not responded to the show cause order. Id. at 3. Accordingly, he recommended dismissal without prejudice. Id. at 4.

These Defendants are identified as: (1) Prison Health Services; (2) Sally; (3) Dr. Shanti Gopal; (4) John Doe; (5) Jane Doe; (6) Correctional Medical Services; (7) Dr. Jeffrey Steele; (8) Tyra S. McKinney; (9) Richard Hallworth; (10) Dennis Wade; (11) Mark Jansen; (12) Dr. Hariesh Pandya; (13) Lawrence Pomeroy.

Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendants filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 109) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Morris's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 56) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge
Dated: November 24, 2014

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon Muncey Morris, at 12882 Dwyer, Detroit, MI 48212 by first class U.S. mail on November 24, 2014.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Morris v. Newberry Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 24, 2014
Case No. 11-cv-10938 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Morris v. Newberry Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:MUNCEY MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. NEWBERRY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 24, 2014

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-10938 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 24, 2014)