From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. McLaughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Jan 9, 2012
NO. 4:11-CV-189-CDL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 4:11-CV-189-CDL-MSH

01-09-2012

HERMAN MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Warden GREGORY McLAUGHLIN, Respondent.


28 U.S.C. § 2254


ORDER

Petitioner HERMAN MORRIS, a prisoner at Macon State Prison, has filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In compliance with this Court's Order dated December 14, 2011 (ECF No. 5), Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the Petitioner shall amend his petition to include every unalleged possible constitutional error or deprivation entitling him to federal habeas corpus relief, failing which the Petitioner will be presumed to have deliberately waived his right to complain of any constitutional errors or deprivations other than those set forth in his initial habeas petition. If amended, the Petitioner will be presumed to have deliberately waived his right to complain of any constitutional errors or deprivations other than those set forth in his initial and amended habeas petition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent file an answer to the allegations of the petition and any amendments within sixty (60) days after service of this order and in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Either with the filing of the answer or within fifteen (15) days after the answer is filed, the Respondent shall move for the petition to be dismissed or shall explain in writing to the Court why the petition cannot be adjudicated by a motion to dismiss.

No discovery shall be commenced by either party without the express permission of the court. Unless and until the Petitioner demonstrates to this court that the state habeas court's factfinding procedure was not adequate to afford a full and fair evidentiary hearing or that the state habeas court did not afford the opportunity for a full, fair, and adequate hearing, this Court's consideration of this habeas petition will be limited to an examination of the evidence and other matters presented to the state trial, habeas, and appellate courts.

The Clerk of Court shall serve, by U.S. Mail, a copy of this Order, the Petition, and any amendments thereto on the Respondent and on the Attorney General for the State of Georgia. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner. Petitioner is advised that his failure to keep the Clerk of the Court informed as to any change of address may result in the dismissal of this action.

STEPHEN HYLES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Morris v. McLaughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION
Jan 9, 2012
NO. 4:11-CV-189-CDL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Morris v. McLaughlin

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Warden GREGORY McLAUGHLIN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 4:11-CV-189-CDL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 9, 2012)