From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 17, 2017
9:16-CV-1533 (LEK/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2017)

Opinion

9:16-CV-1533 (LEK/TWD)

11-17-2017

REGAN MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. WENDY KING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court following a report-recommendation filed on October 13, 2017, by the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3. Dkt. No. 24 ("Report-Recommendation").

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); L.R. 72.1(c). If no objections are made, or if an objection is general, conclusory, perfunctory, or a mere reiteration of an argument made to the magistrate judge, a district court need review that aspect of a report-recommendation only for clear error. Barnes v. Prack, No. 11-CV-857, 2013 WL 1121353, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2013); see also Machicote v. Ercole, No. 06-CV-13320, 2011 WL 3809920, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2011) ("[E]ven a pro se party's objections to a Report and Recommendation must be specific and clearly aimed at particular findings in the magistrate's proposal, such that no party be allowed a second bite at the apple by simply relitigating a prior argument."). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." § 636(b).

No objections were filed in the allotted time period. Docket. Thus, the Court has reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and has found none.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 17, 2017

Albany, New York

/s/_________

Lawrence E. Kahn

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Morris v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 17, 2017
9:16-CV-1533 (LEK/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Morris v. King

Case Details

Full title:REGAN MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. WENDY KING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 17, 2017

Citations

9:16-CV-1533 (LEK/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2017)