From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Hickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 29, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P.

October 29, 2008


ORDER


On October 6, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion for an order pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 23. Plaintiff requests that the court order the Warden not to transfer him to a different prison during the pendency of this action. The grounds of this request are that plaintiff will not be able to continue receiving help from his jailhouse lawyer if he is transferred.

Fed.R.App.P. 23 concerns the transfer of custody of inmates who are proceeding with habeas corpus actions. Because the instant motion is not properly brought, it is denied. Plaintiff's request for relief is more properly raised in a motion for injunctive relief. However, such a motion would most likely be denied because prisoners have no constitutional right to be housed in a particular prison. Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 103 S.Ct. 1741 (1983); see also Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 96 S.Ct. 2532 (1976) (concluding a prisoner has no liberty interest in which prison he is housed).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 6, 2008, request for relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 (# 43) is denied.


Summaries of

Morris v. Hickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 29, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Morris v. Hickinson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. D. HICKINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2008)