From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Hickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 24, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P.

October 24, 2008


ORDER


On September 12, 2008, plaintiff filed a request for entry of default. This request is denied for the following reasons.

On June 2, 2008, the court recommended that defendants motion to dismiss be denied in part. The court also ordered defendant Hickison to file an answer to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims within twenty days of the district court's adoption of the findings and recommendations. On August 20, 2008, the district court adopted the June 2, 2008, findings and recommendations and ordered defendants to file an answer within twenty days.

On September 8, 2008, defendants filed a timely answer. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for entry of default is denied.

On September 22, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion for a settlement conference. Unless all parties desire a settlement conference, it has been the undersigned's experience in these type of cases that the case will not settle. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's September 12, 2008, request for entry of default (# 39) is denied;

2. Plaintiff's September 22, 2008, motion for a settlement conference (# 41) is denied.


Summaries of

Morris v. Hickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 24, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Morris v. Hickinson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. D. HICKINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 24, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2936 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2008)