From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-00426-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00426-APG-DJA

10-07-2022

Marvin Dewey Morris and Meihua Zhang, Plaintiffs, v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States of America; Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Ur M. Jaddou, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Clyde Moore, Field Office Director, Las Vegas Field Office U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendants.

JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney SKYLER H. PEARSON Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States PETER L. ASHMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs


JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

SKYLER H. PEARSON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

PETER L. ASHMAN

Attorney for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE UNITED STATES' DEADLINE TO ANSWER

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiffs Marvin Dewey Morris and Meihua Zhang and the United States of America, on behalf of Federal Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, and Clyde Moore, through counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on March 8, 2022.

2. Plaintiffs served the United States with a copy of the Summons and Complaint on June 9, 2022.

3. The current deadline for Federal Defendants to answer or otherwise respond is October 7, 2022.

4. The parties have agreed that the United States shall have 30 additional days to file an answer or other responsive pleading on behalf of Federal Defendants. Since the time Plaintiffs filed their complaint, Federal Defendants have issued a notice of intent to deny to which Plaintiff responded. The notice and Plaintiff's response thereto may resolve some or all the issues involved in this litigation and/or alleviate the need for court intervention. Accordingly, the parties request that Federal Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading be extended an additional 30 days to allow the parties to continue to work towards resolution.

5. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

Therefore, the parties request that the Court extend the deadline for the United States to answer or otherwise respond by November 7, 2022.


Summaries of

Morris v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-00426-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Morris v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:Marvin Dewey Morris and Meihua Zhang, Plaintiffs, v. Merrick Garland…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00426-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)