From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 29, 2022
12-cv-04964-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2022)

Opinion

12-cv-04964-JSW

08-29-2022

STEPHEN MORRIS and KELLY McDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, and ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP, Defendants.

MAX FOLKENFLIK (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) FOLKENFLIK & MCGERITY ROSS L. LIBENSON, (State Bar No. 181912) LIBENSON LAW Counsel for Plaintiffs


MAX FOLKENFLIK (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

FOLKENFLIK & MCGERITY

ROSS L. LIBENSON, (State Bar No. 181912)

LIBENSON LAW Counsel for Plaintiffs

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS

The Court having been informed that the Plaintiffs have initiated arbitration proceedings consistent with this Court's prior order [ECF no. 86], hereby vacates it order of August 26, 2022 [ECF no. 87], and directs the Clerk to re-open the file. The Court further Orders this matter shall be stayed during the pendency of the arbitrations, and at the conclusion of each arbitration the parties shall so inform the Court. within 5 days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 29, 2022
12-cv-04964-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN MORRIS and KELLY McDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 29, 2022

Citations

12-cv-04964-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2022)