From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Aug 13, 2013
Civil Action No. 6:12-02236-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:12-02236-TMC

08-13-2013

Beverly Morris, Plaintiff, v. John Doe; Electric Insurance Company, Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER

On May 8, 2013, counsel for the plaintiff filed a Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 36), which advised the court that the plaintiff, Beverly Morris, died on April 2, 2013. The motion was filed without objection.

By text order entered on May 9, 2013, the court partially granted the motion to stay and provided that the action would be stayed for 90 days to allow for possible substitution of parties pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 25(a).

Rule 25(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides as follows: Rule 25(a) Death.

(1) Substitution if the Claim Is Not Extinguished. If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.
Fed. R. Civ. 25(a).

The 90 day time period for filing a motion for substitution has expired. Neither party has filed a motion for substitution or motion to extend the time for filing. The federal rules of civil procedure "should be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." Fed. R. Civ. 1.

Accordingly, in the absence of a motion for substitution or request for extension of time, this action should be dismissed without prejudice. In light of this ruling, defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 30) is moot.

Now therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 30) is DENIED as moot and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Timothy M. Cain

United States District Court Judge
Anderson, South Carolina
August 13, 2013


Summaries of

Morris v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Aug 13, 2013
Civil Action No. 6:12-02236-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Morris v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:Beverly Morris, Plaintiff, v. John Doe; Electric Insurance Company…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:12-02236-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2013)