From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Danon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1995
213 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 7, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.).


Any conflict in the testimony with respect to whether Brevitol could have entered plaintiff's wrist by the insertion of a hypodermic into either the back of her hand or her wrist, and any conflict in the expert opinions with respect to causation of the injury, were for the jury to resolve and we decline to disturb its determination. We have considered appellants' other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Morris v. Danon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1995
213 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Morris v. Danon

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER MORRIS, Respondent, v. MILTON DANON et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 809