From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Bradford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1171 LKK DAD P.

September 1, 2011


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed July 21, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Morris v. Bradford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Morris v. Bradford

Case Details

Full title:LEON E. MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. A.J. R. BRADFORD et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)