From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Board of Education of Estill County

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington
Aug 10, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-513-KKC (E.D. Ky. Aug. 10, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-513-KKC.

August 10, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion in limine. Plaintiff Bonnie Morris ("Morris") alleges that Defendant unlawfully denied her employment opportunities with Estill County Schools because of her visual impairment. In support of this claim, Morris seeks to introduce into evidence a "CD of conversations and transcribed conversations of Plaintiff and administration of elementary school." Rec. 38, Pl.'s Exh. List. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant's motion in limine and prohibit the introduction of these transcripts into evidence at trial.

I. DISCUSSION

Federal Rule of Evidence 901 requires that all documents to be submitted into evidence be authenticated, "by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims." Fed.R.Evid. 901(a). In this case, Morris has not offered any evidence to support a finding by this Court that the transcripts of conversations with administrators of the Estill County Schools are what she purports them to be.

During her deposition testimony, Morris acknowledged that she recorded these conversation, and subsequently transcribed them without the consent of the witnesses. Rec. 45-4, Pl.'s Dep. at 43:7-44:3. Morris cannot authenticate the transcripts that she prepared because she broke the recording device and apparently threw it away. Id. at 44:8-11. Morris also claims that she no longer has the cassettes from which she made the transcripts. Id. at 44:16-45:10. She claims that she recorded over the same tape multiple times and that tape was eventually thrown away or lost.

Because Morris is unable to authenticate the transcripts that she prepared, they are not admissible evidence. Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a) clearly makes authentication a "condition precedent to admissibility." Accordingly, the Court grants Defendant's motion in limine and prohibits the introduction into evidence of the transcripts prepared by Morris because they cannot be authenticated.


Summaries of

Morris v. Board of Education of Estill County

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington
Aug 10, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-513-KKC (E.D. Ky. Aug. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Morris v. Board of Education of Estill County

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE MORRIS, PLAINTIFF v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ESTILL COUNTY, KENTUCKY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington

Date published: Aug 10, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-513-KKC (E.D. Ky. Aug. 10, 2010)