From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 9, 2022
3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2022)

Opinion

3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC

08-09-2022

LISA MORRIS, MICHAEL BUI, and TUMIKA WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on documents purporting to be Notices of Appeal filed by the United States Department of the Treasury as “substituted party.” (Doc. Nos. 96, 97).

This Court has not designated the Treasury Department as a substitute party. Additionally, the documents reference “federal trustee” Duane L. Berry as a class member in this litigation. The post marks on the envelopes indicate that the purported Notices of Appeal were mailed from or near the town in Michigan to which his settlement check was sent, rather than Washington, D.C. (Doc. No. 95 at 12-13; Doc. No. 12-13).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the United States Attorney shall file a pleading within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order stating whether the documents, (Doc. No. 96, 97), were filed under the authority of the United States Department of the Treasury.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morris v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 9, 2022
3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Morris v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:LISA MORRIS, MICHAEL BUI, and TUMIKA WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2022

Citations

3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2022)