From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Auld

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Oct 11, 1923
255 S.W. 253 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 5.

October 11, 1923.

Error from Limestone County Court; H. F. Kirby, Judge.

Proceeding between Mrs. Fannie Morris and M. Auld. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Aultman Byers, of Mexia, for plaintiff in error.

A. B. Rennolds, of Mexia, for defendant in error.


This is an appeal from the county court of Limestone county, the case having been originally filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District and by that court transferred to this court.

An inspection of the record fails to disclose that any notice of appeal was given by the plaintiff in error in the lower court. In the absence of such notice, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction of the cause, and the appeal is therefore dismissed. Article 2084, Revised Statutes of Texas; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'Keefe, 87 Tex. 823, 28 S.W. 945; Smithwick v. Kelly, 79 Tex. 564, 15 S.W. 486; Beaumont v. Newsome (Tex.Civ.App.) 143 S.W. 941; Beversdorff v. Dienger (Tex.Civ.App.) 141 S.W. 533; Goldman v. Broyles (Tex.Civ.App.) 141 S.W. 283; Eclipse Paint Mfg. Co. v. New Process Roofing Supply Co., 55 Tex. Civ. App. 553, 120 S.W. 532.


Summaries of

Morris v. Auld

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Oct 11, 1923
255 S.W. 253 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

Morris v. Auld

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS v. AULD

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco

Date published: Oct 11, 1923

Citations

255 S.W. 253 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Republic Nat. Bank v. Jordan

Therefore appellant's notice of appeal should have been noted on the court's trial docket and incorporated in…

Rausch v. W. Union Tel. Co.

The record must show, either in the final judgment or in some separate court order, that notice of appeal was…