From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Sotela

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 13, 2005
No. Civ S-05-1275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. Civ S-05-1275 DFL GGH P.

October 13, 2005


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed July 15, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate filing fee in the amount of $250.00 within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff was re-served with this order on July 25, 2005. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Day v. Sotela

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 13, 2005
No. Civ S-05-1275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Day v. Sotela

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS DAY aka RICKEY LOUIS ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. C/O SOTELA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 13, 2005

Citations

No. Civ S-05-1275 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)