From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moroze Sherman v. Moroze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.).


In this action to determine the price at which plaintiff professional corporation is required to purchase or redeem the shares of its deceased 50% shareholder and founder pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1510, the IAS Court properly found the existence of issues of fact as to whether plaintiff's method of valuation at book value in accordance with the corporation's regular method of accounting would produce a windfall to the surviving shareholder together with an unjust hardship to the decedent's estate ( see, Diamond Golomb v Diamond, 189 A.D.2d 722, 724, citing Moroze Sherman v Moroze, 104 A.D.2d 70). The statute does not necessarily require application of a strict book value method under these circumstances. In this case, the value of all contingent receivables and work in progress as of the date of decedent's death should be considered.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Moroze Sherman v. Moroze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Moroze Sherman v. Moroze

Case Details

Full title:MOROZE SHERMAN, P.C., Appellant-Respondent, v. M. BRIAN MOROZE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

In re Bernfeld

Once dissolved, a corporation continues to "function for the purpose of winding up the affairs of the…

Gursel v. S. Westchester Urology Group, P.C

Contrary to the defendants' contention, the arbitrator's failure to consider only the book value of the…