From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morosky v. Allstate Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-996 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-996

11-13-2012

JOSEPH MOROSKY, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


Judge Cathy Bissoon


ORDER

Defendant's Motion (Doc. 17) to sever Plaintiff's bad faith claims is DENIED, for essentially the same reasons as stated in Consugar v. Nationwide Ins. Co. of Amer., 2011 WL 2360208, *6-7 & n.1 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2011). Defendant's Motion (Doc. 16) for a protective order also is DENIED, although, as Plaintiff agrees, the deadline for Defendant's responses to written discovery is established by reference to the parties' Rule 26(f) conference, not the date that the discovery requests were served. See Pl.'s Opp'n Br. (Doc. 21) at ¶ 6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Morosky v. Allstate Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-996 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Morosky v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MOROSKY, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-996 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 2012)