From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morley v. Marshal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Jul 10, 2013
NO. CV-13-108-JPH (E.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CV-13-108-JPH

07-10-2013

SHANNON BRUCE MORLEY, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN MARSHAL and COMMANDER NOAH STUART, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING

COMPLAINT AND DENYING PENDING

MOTIONS

Magistrate Judge Hutton filed a Report and Recommendation on June 17, 2013, recommending Mr. Morley's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), that his complaint dismiss and all pending motions be denied as moot. There being no objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Application to Proceed in forma Pauperis is DENIED as precluded under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the filing fee requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The pending Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint, ECF No. 6, is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, forward a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address and close the file. The Court certifies any appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.

______________________

LONNY R. SUKO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morley v. Marshal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Jul 10, 2013
NO. CV-13-108-JPH (E.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Morley v. Marshal

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON BRUCE MORLEY, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN MARSHAL and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

Citations

NO. CV-13-108-JPH (E.D. Wash. Jul. 10, 2013)