From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morley v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2019
No. 19-6386 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6386

07-24-2019

EUGENE ELLIOTT MORLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Eugene Elliott Morley, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00134-MSD-LRL) Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Elliott Morley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene Elliott Morley appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, construing Morley's "Motion for Further Action" as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion and dismissing it as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morley v. Clarke, No. 2:15-cv-00134-MSD-LRL (E.D. VA. Feb. 22, 2019). We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Morley v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2019
No. 19-6386 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Morley v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE ELLIOTT MORLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 24, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6386 (4th Cir. Jul. 24, 2019)