From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morice v. Morice

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 16, 1980
386 So. 2d 913 (La. 1980)

Opinion

No. 67783.

June 16, 1980.

Robert G. Creely, Amato Creely, Gretna, for plaintiff-applicant.

Richard J. McGinity, McGinity McGinity, New Orleans, for defendant-respondent.


After the wife filed a suit for separation in Orleans Parish, the husband filed a suit for separation in Jefferson Parish. The wife made a general appearance in the Jefferson Parish suit before filing an exception of lis pendens, which was overruled because she had waived the objection. C.C.P. art. 925.

The wife then excepted to the Jefferson Parish court's jurisdiction over the subject matter. The trial court overruled the exception, but on the husband's application for supervisory writs the intermediate court reversed, citing State ex rel. Marston v. Marston, 67 So.2d 587 (La. 1953), for the proposition that the court which first obtains jurisdiction over the subject matter retains it to the exclusion of all others.

We reverse and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

The Marston case (decided before the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure) did not involve an exception to the jurisdiction over the subject matter. That case involved a timely filed exception of lis pendens which had been overruled, and this court ordered that the exception be maintained, using the language relied on by the intermediate court in the present case.

In the present case both courts had jurisdiction over the subject matter, and neither suit was subject to dismissal because of lack of jurisdiction. The party filing first could have only obtained dismissal of the second suit by filing a timely exception of lis pendens, and the Marston case would have been controlling. However, since the defendant in the second suit did not file a timely exception of lis pendens, any plaintiff may continue the prosecution of any suit until rendition of the first final judgment, which shall be conclusive of all suits. C.C.P. art. 531.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

DENNIS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Morice v. Morice

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 16, 1980
386 So. 2d 913 (La. 1980)
Case details for

Morice v. Morice

Case Details

Full title:NATCHEZ JOSEPH MORICE, JR. v. LISELOTTE SCHROTH MORICE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 16, 1980

Citations

386 So. 2d 913 (La. 1980)

Citing Cases

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Williams

First, lis pendens is an objection raised through the declinatory exception which is considered waived if the…

Lemon v. Lemon

On that basis alone, the court was required to dismiss the later suit upon the defendant's exception of lis…