Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Moriarity v. Shyne

244 App. Div. 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Moriarity v. Shyne

1 Citing case

  1. Valerio v. Sleeth Pontiac, Inc.

    9 A.D.2d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)   Cited 1 times

    The dismissal of the action against Sleeth Pontiac was also improper. If Sleeth Pontiac had given direct permission to Larabee to drive the automobile, Sleeth Pontiac could be held liable to Valerio for Larabee's negligence under section 59 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Glennie v. Falls Equip. Co. ( 238 App. Div. 7) would not be applicable in that situation. (See Moriarity v. Shyne, 244 App. Div. 868; cf. Cohen v. Neustadter, 247 N.Y. 207.) The proper determination of Sleeth Pontiac's action for conversion or destruction of the automobile also depends upon the proof which was erroneously excluded.