From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Wallaby Yogurt Co., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 20, 2015
Case No. 13-cv-00296-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-00296-JD

08-20-2015

FRANK MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WALLABY YOGURT COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER RE STAY

This is a consumer class action that challenges defendant Wallaby Yogurt Company, Inc.'s use of the term "evaporated cane juice" (ECJ) instead of "sugar" or a similar term on its labels listing the ingredients of its food products. Dkt. No. 35.

The Court previously granted defendant's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 64) and stayed the case (Dkt. No. 72) because it agreed with the reasoning in cases such as Swearingen v. Amazon Pres. Partners, Inc., No. 13-CV-04402-WHO, 2014 WL 3934000 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2014). See also, e.g., Gitson v. Trader Joe's Co., 63 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (N.D. Cal. 2014); Figy v. Lifeway Foods, Inc., No. 13-cv-04828-TEH, 2014 WL 1779251 (N.D. Cal. May 5, 2014).

Mary Swearingen v. Late July Snacks LLC, Case No. 3:13-cv-04324-EMC (N.D. Cal.), is another case in this district that has been stayed for quite some time "pending the FDA's decision . . . regarding whether 'evaporated cane juice' (ECJ) is a common or usual name for sugar." See Dkt. No. 78 in Case No. 13-cv-4324. In that case, Judge Chen consequently requested that the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration shed some light on "whether a final determination regarding ECJ 'is feasible within agency priorities and resources,'" and specifically "if the FDA is likely to issue any further guidance regarding ECJ within the next 180 days." Id. The FDA has recently responded that while it is "actively working on a final guidance" to address this issue, it "cannot commit to issuing a decision within 180 days," and that it instead "currently anticipates that a final guidance will issue before the end of 2016." Dkt. No. 80 in Case No. 13-cv-4324.

In light of this statement from the FDA, the Court directs plaintiffs and defendant in this case to file by September 9, 2015, a statement of no more than five pages each, addressing whether and why the Court should (or should not) continue to stay this case. Responses to the other side's submission are not permitted, and no hearing will be held, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2015

/s/_________

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Morgan v. Wallaby Yogurt Co., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 20, 2015
Case No. 13-cv-00296-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Morgan v. Wallaby Yogurt Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WALLABY YOGURT COMPANY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-00296-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015)