Opinion
1:14CR414-1 1:14 CR194- 1:20CV965
01-12-2022
ORDER
Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge.
The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 10, 2021, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 50 in case 1:14CR194; Doc. 40 in case 1:14CR414.)
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. Petitioner's objections are without merit and, beyond that, any effort to amend the section 2255 motion to add a new ground for relief is denied as futile because it is both time-barred and meritless. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Government's motion to dismiss (Doc. 41 in case 1:14CR00194-1; Doc. 31 in case 1:14CR00414-1) are GRANTED and that Petitioner's motion (Doc. 33 in case 1:14CR00194-1; Doc. 23 in case 1:14CR00414-1) to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence be DISMISSED. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.