From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 26, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-00475.

September 26, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are the rightful owners of certain real property, the defendants appeal from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 10, 2003, which after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that the plaintiff Kay Morgan was the sole title holder of the subject real property.

Thomas Torto, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Hagan, Coury Associates, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Paul Golden of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants waived the assertion of the affirmative defenses of laches, unclean hands, and equitable estoppel by not raising them in the pleadings ( see CPLR 3018 [b]; Fade v. Pugliani/Fade, 8 AD3d 612, 614-615; Kromer v. Kromer, 177 AD2d 472, 473). In any event, there was sufficient proof adduced at trial for the Supreme Court, as the trier of fact, to conclude that the elements of the asserted defenses were not established.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 26, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Morgan v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:KAY MORGAN, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS MORGAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 26, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 1068 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6907
801 N.Y.S.2d 158

Citing Cases

In re Lekki

[4] With respect to proceeding No. 2, we conclude that, contrary to the son’s contention, by failing to…

In re Lekki

With respect to proceeding No. 2, we conclude that, contrary to the son's contention, by failing to assert…