From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Laurent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2004
3 A.D.3d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-00155.

Decided January 26, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.) dated December 6, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Harmon, Linder Rogowsky, New York, N.Y. (Jenna Anderson of counsel), for appellant.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DANIEL F. LUCIANO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

We reverse the Supreme Court's order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, since there are triable issues of fact as to whether the conduct of the defendant Randolph Laurent contributed to the cause of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Romano v. 202 Corp., 305 A.D.2d 576).

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Laurent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2004
3 A.D.3d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Morgan v. Laurent

Case Details

Full title:LENNOX MORGAN, Appellant, v. RANDOLPH LAURENT, ET AL., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 646

Citing Cases

Vargas v. Olympic Limousine, Inc.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent. The Supreme Court properly denied…