From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Goodman Mfg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 26, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-00850 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-00850

03-26-2021

RODDIE MORGAN, Plaintiff. v. GOODMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On October 7, 2020, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 28) and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 36) were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 64. On March 10, 2021, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 68) recommending that both motions (Dkts. 28,36) be DENIED, and that this case proceed to trial on the merits.

No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 68) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;

(2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 28) is DENIED; and

(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 36) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 26th day of March 2021.

/s/_________

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morgan v. Goodman Mfg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 26, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-00850 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Morgan v. Goodman Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RODDIE MORGAN, Plaintiff. v. GOODMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-00850 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2021)

Citing Cases

Way v. Helix Energy Sols. Grp.

Since then, the Fifth Circuit "has not addressed whether Twombly and Iqbal effectively overruled Woodfield."…

J.A. Masters Inv. v. Beltramini

Since then, the Fifth Circuit "has not addressed whether Twombly and Iqbal effectively overruled Woodfield."…