From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2155 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2155 WBS KJN P.

February 25, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 16, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 29) is denied.

DATED: February 24, 2011


Summaries of

Morgan v. Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2155 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Morgan v. Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. CA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 25, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2155 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2011)