From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-319-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-319-AP.

January 4, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Amended Motion to Remand (doc. #30), filed January 3, 2011. The Motion is GRANTED. Defendant's previous Motion to Remand (doc. #24), filed December 2, 2010 is DENIED AS MOOT. Having reviewed the file and considered the motion, I reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand for further proceedings with the following instructions:

The Commissioner shall assign this case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) to consider all pertinent issues de novo. In particular, the ALJ will further evaluate the opinion from Plaintiff's treating therapist, Cynthia Varney. Ms. Varney opined that Plaintiff would not be able to complete a normal workday and workweek without interruptions from psychologically based symptoms, and would not be able to perform at a consistent pace without an unreasonable number and length of rest periods or unexcused absences greater than 2-3 per month or be able to handle normal work stress (Tr. 640-42). Accordingly, it is ordered that this case is reversed and remanded for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).

Dated: January 4, 2011.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-319-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Morgan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA J. MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-319-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 4, 2011)