From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan Stanley Private Bank v. Randall

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2024
3:24-CV-187-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-187-FDW-DCK

02-28-2024

MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK, NA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES RANDALL, Respondent.


ORDER

David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 47) filed by C. Bailey King, Jr., concerning Thomas A. Linthorst, on February 27, 2024. Thomas A. Linthorst seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Petitioner. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 47) is GRANTED. Thomas A. Linthorst is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Petitioner.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morgan Stanley Private Bank v. Randall

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2024
3:24-CV-187-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Morgan Stanley Private Bank v. Randall

Case Details

Full title:MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK, NA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES RANDALL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 28, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-187-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)