From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moretz v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Aug 31, 2022
Civil 5:21-cv-00046-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civil 5:21-cv-00046-MR-WCM

08-31-2022

JULIE O. MORETZ, Plaintiff, v. KILOLOL KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Martin Reidinger Chief United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 15]; the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 17]; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation regarding the disposition of those motions [Doc. 20]; and the Plaintiff's Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 21].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and a specific Order of referral of the District Court, the Honorable W. Carleton Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge, was designated to consider these pending motions in the above- captioned action and to submit to this Court a recommendation for the disposition of these motions.

On August 10, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 20], recommending that this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the Plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. [Doc. 20]. The parties were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation were to be filed in writing within fourteen (14) days of service. The Plaintiff timely filed Objections on August 24, 2022. [Doc. 21]. The Commissioner filed a Reply on August 26, 2022. [Doc. 22].

After careful consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 20] and the Plaintiff's Objections thereto [Doc. 21], the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings of fact are correct and that his proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby overrules the Plaintiff's Objections and accepts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 20] is ACCEPTED; the Plaintiff's Objections thereto 2 [Doc. 21] are OVERRULED; the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 15] is DENIED; the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 17] is GRANTED; and the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED. This case is hereby DISMISSED.

A judgment shall be entered simultaneously herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moretz v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Aug 31, 2022
Civil 5:21-cv-00046-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Moretz v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:JULIE O. MORETZ, Plaintiff, v. KILOLOL KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

Civil 5:21-cv-00046-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)