From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moretti v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502392.

December 13, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Robert Moretti, Fallsburg, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting illicit drug use. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. Upon administrative review, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and testimony adduced at the hearing supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Crosby v Goord, 38 AD3d 1110; Matter of Hoover v Goord, 38 AD3d 1069, 1070, lv denied 8 NY3d 816). As for petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance, any defects in the assistance provided to him were cured by the Hearing Officer at the time of the hearing ( see Matter of Ellison v Goord, 274 AD2d 800, 801). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly denied the right to present evidence, there were deficiencies in the chain of custody and the Hearing Officer was biased, and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Moretti v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Moretti v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT MORETTI, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9841
846 N.Y.S.2d 822

Citing Cases

Smith v. Fischer

We confirm. The misbehavior report, urinalysis test results and related documentation, as well as the hearing…

Jenkins v. Donald

The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence including the misbehavior report and related…