From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreno v. Thaler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.).


Although it did not explicitly so state, it is clear that the trial court concluded, correctly, that in view of the sharply conflicting evidence on the issue of causation, plaintiff's serious injury and the jury's inexplicably low award therefor, it was highly likely that the verdict was a compromise verdict, and properly directed a new trial on all issues ( see, Sheffield v. New York City Hous. Auth., 200 A.D.2d 369).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Moreno v. Thaler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Moreno v. Thaler

Case Details

Full title:HECTOR MORENO et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL THALER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 814

Citing Cases

Rebecca Broadway Ltd. P'ship v. Thibodeau

If there is no evidence to support the jury's award for damages, the entire verdict—including the liability…

Nakasato v. 331 W. 51st Corp.

The jury notes suggest that the compromise may have included the answer to question 1 on the verdict sheet.…