Opinion
November 17, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.).
Although it did not explicitly so state, it is clear that the trial court concluded, correctly, that in view of the sharply conflicting evidence on the issue of causation, plaintiff's serious injury and the jury's inexplicably low award therefor, it was highly likely that the verdict was a compromise verdict, and properly directed a new trial on all issues ( see, Sheffield v. New York City Hous. Auth., 200 A.D.2d 369).
Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.