Opinion
No. 08-12-00028-CR
2013-09-24
Patrick De La Cruz Moreno, Appellant, v. The State of Texas, State.
Appeal from the 112th District Court Of Pecos County, Texas
(TC# 3156)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Appellant's pro se motion to supplement the record with an incident/arrest report, a letter written by Appellant, and an expert report. This is Appellant's third motion to supplement the record. In the motion, Appellant also complains about the Court's determination that two previous motions to supplement would be passed and considered when the case is submitted on the merits. The items Appellant wishes to have included in the record are evidentiary in nature. The Court has reviewed the reporter's record of the trial and none of the items addressed by the first, second, or third motions to supplement were admitted into evidence. Consequently, none of the items can be made part of the appellate record by supplementing the reporter's record or the clerk's record. We therefore DENY the first, second, and third motions to supplement the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2013.
PER CURIAM Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.