Opinion
May, 1927.
Present — Kelly, P.J., Manning, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.
Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that within ten days from entry of order herein defendants file a corporate undertaking to secure the judgment.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Morell v. Seldin, Seldin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Summaries of
Morell v. Seldin, Seldin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for
Morell v. Seldin, Seldin
Case Details
Full title:EVA MORELL, Respondent, v. SAM SELDIN and SAMUEL H. SELDIN, Appellants
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: May 1, 1927
Citations
220 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)