From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreland v. Snyder

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 4, 1984
459 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-2096.

December 4, 1984.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Prohibition.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Henry R. Barksdale, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Upon the conclusion that there was plainly no "manifest necessity" to justify the trial court's sua sponte declaration of a mistrial after the jury had been sworn below, see Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. McNeil, 362 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), we grant the defendant's petition for prohibition to preclude his retrial in violation of his rights against double jeopardy.

The state relies on Edwards v. State, 336 So.2d 447 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). We distinguish the case on its facts without endorsing or repudiating its holding.

We are sure that the issuance of the formal writ will not be required.


Summaries of

Moreland v. Snyder

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 4, 1984
459 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Moreland v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL MORELAND, PETITIONER, v. THE HONORABLE ARTHUR I. SNYDER, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 4, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)