From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morejon v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 1999
738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-2028.

Opinion filed September 1, 1999.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction-Habeas Corpus, Raul Morejon, in proper person, L.T. No. 96-41613.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for respondents.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.


We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. A petition for writ of habeas corpus that is in effect a successive motion for postconviction relief is procedurally barred. See Ali v. State, 729 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999);Phillips v. Singletary, 728 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Morejon v. State, No. 99-1824 (Fla. 3d DCA July 28, 1999); see also Robinson v. State, 707 So.2d 688 (Fla. 1998) (holding that defendant who seeks postconviction relief is procedurally barred from raising claims that could or should have been raised on direct appeal);Morejon v. State, 729 So.2d 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

Morejon v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 1, 1999
738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Morejon v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:RAUL MOREJON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL W. MOORE and THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 1, 1999

Citations

738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Santiexposito v. State

HENDON, J. The issues raised by the defendant are procedurally barred as they should have and could have been…

Santiexposito v. State

The issues raised by the defendant are procedurally barred as they should have and could have been raised on…