From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreira v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2977.

Decided February 26, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered May 14, 2003, which denied the motion of defendant Police Athletic League (PAL) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it or, in the alternative, for summary judgment upon its cross claim for contractual indemnification from its codefendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Laura M. Colatrella, for Plaintiffs-Respondents.

Steven I. Brizel, for Defendant.

Lorin K. Donnelly, for Defendant-Appellant.

James K. O'Sullivan, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Lerner, JJ.


Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she tripped and fell in a hole in a temporary walkway erected by defendants in connection with a construction project. PAL's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it was properly denied since it failed to address plaintiffs' allegations that it had actual and constructive notice of the alleged hazard. "[I]t is not plaintiff's burden in opposing [a motion] for summary judgment to establish that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition. Rather, it is defendants' burden to establish the lack of notice as a matter of law" ( Giuffrida v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 279 A.D.2d 403, 404).

Inasmuch as the contracts pursuant to which indemnification was sought by PAL had not yet been produced, that branch of PAL's motion seeking summary judgment upon its claims for contractual indemnification was properly denied as premature.

We have considered PAL's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Moreira v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Moreira v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROSA J. MOREIRA, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

Valderrama v. New York City Transit Authority

Viewing the submissions in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the opponent of the summary judgment…

Scansarole v. Madison Square Garden, L.P.

While, at trial, plaintiff will have to prove notice, on a defendant's motion for summary judgment the burden…