From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morehouse v. Alexander

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Nov 3, 2008
9:08-CV-0946 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2008)

Opinion

9:08-CV-0946 (LEK/GHL).

November 3, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on September 30, 2008 by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 4). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Scott Morehouse, which were filed on October 14, 2008. Objections (Dkt. No. 5).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is sua sponte DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No 6) is DISMISSED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morehouse v. Alexander

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Nov 3, 2008
9:08-CV-0946 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Morehouse v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT MOREHOUSE, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE ALEXANDER, Chairman, N.Y.S. Div. of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Nov 3, 2008

Citations

9:08-CV-0946 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Morehouse v. Vasques

B. Plaintiff's IFP StatusDefendants argue that the following cases qualify as "strikes" sufficient to revoke…

Robles v. Dennison

'") (quoting Brown v. Thomas, No. 02 Civ. 9257, 2003 W L 941940, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2003) (in turn…