From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morban v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 2004
11 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4162

October 21, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered on or about May 16, 2003, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, defendant's motion denied, plaintiff's complaint reinstated, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability granted as to the issue of fault, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.


Plaintiff was allegedly injured on September 3, 1999 when his car was rear-ended by defendant's vehicle. The defendant moved for summary judgment and the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious physical injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The court improperly granted defendant's motion as plaintiff's submissions in opposition to the motion raised a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a serious physical injury. Furthermore, plaintiff's unopposed motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability should have been granted ( see Mullen v. Rigor, 8 AD3d 104; Mitchell v. Gonzalez, 269 AD2d 250).


Summaries of

Morban v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 2004
11 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Morban v. Nunez

Case Details

Full title:LEONIDAS MORBAN, Appellant, v. FEDERICO NUNEZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 554

Citing Cases

Bonito v. Singh

Moreover, there was no evidence that defendants acted in such a way as to cause the accident. In the absence…