From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moran v. Zelen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 16, 2007
224 F. App'x 671 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-55169.

Submitted March 12, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Moran's request oral argument is denied.

Filed March 16, 2007.

Gene Lowell Moran, Huntington Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

USSA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, Timothy J. Harris, Esq., Charlston, Revich and Chamberlin, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Marcus M. Kerner, Esq., for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-00970-CJC.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Gene Lowell Moran appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his declaratory judgment action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered January 10, 2006.

To the extent Moran raises contentions before this court not related to the denial of this declaratory judgment action, we decline to consider them. See Snow-Erlin v. United States, 470 F.3d 804, 808 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2006).

We grant appellee Zelen's motion to strike and request for judicial notice.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Moran v. Zelen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 16, 2007
224 F. App'x 671 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Moran v. Zelen

Case Details

Full title:Gene Lowell MORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Garrett J. ZELEN, Esq.; and the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 16, 2007

Citations

224 F. App'x 671 (9th Cir. 2007)