From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moran v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 18, 2024
No. 86087-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 18, 2024)

Opinion

86087-COA

01-18-2024

MARVIN MORAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Gibbons, C.J.

Marvin Moran appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on October 6, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carli Lynn Kierny, Judge.

Moran filed his petition more than three years after entry of the remittitur on direct appeal on July 23, 2018. See Moran v. State, No. 67881, 2018 WL 3216887 (Nev. June 25, 2018) (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding). Thus, Moran's petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Moreover, Moran's petition constituted an abuse of the writ to the extent he raised claims new and different from those raised in his previous petition. See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(3). Moran's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34,726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(4).

See Moran v. State, No. 80328-COA, 2020 WL 6336062 (Nev. Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2020) (Order of Affirmance).

The subsections within NRS 34.810 were recently renumbered. We note the substance of the subsections cited herein was not altered. See A.B. 49, 82d Leg. (Nev. 2023).

Moran suggested that he had good cause to overcome the procedural bars because he needed to exhaust his claims in state court before a federal court would consider them. Filing a procedurally barred petition for exhaustion purposes does not constitute good cause because Moran's claims were reasonably available to be raised in a timely petition. See Colley v. State, 105 Nev. 235, 236, 773 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1989), abrogated by statute on other grounds as recognized by State v. Huebler, 128 Nev. 192, 197 n.2, 275 P.3d 91, 95 n.2 (2012). Therefore, Moran failed to demonstrate that exhaustion constituted good cause, and we conclude the district court did not err by denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Bulla J. Westbrook, J.

Hon. Carli Lynn Kierny, District Judge


Summaries of

Moran v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 18, 2024
No. 86087-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Moran v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN MORAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Jan 18, 2024

Citations

No. 86087-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 18, 2024)