From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moran v. Goldfarb

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 5, 2010
No. 09 Civ. 7667 (RJS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. 09 Civ. 7667 (RJS).

April 5, 2010


ORDER


The Court is in receipt of a letter, dated April 5, 2010, from the Receiver, requesting an extension of time in which to respond to Defendants Matthew Canno and the Matthew Canno Trust's pre-motion letter. Defendants do not object to an extension. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Receiver shall respond to Defendants' letter, which shall not exceed three pages, by Monday, April 12, 2010. The pre-motion conference scheduled for Friday, April 16, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. shall proceed as scheduled in the Court's April 1, 2010 Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moran v. Goldfarb

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 5, 2010
No. 09 Civ. 7667 (RJS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Moran v. Goldfarb

Case Details

Full title:H. THOMAS MORAN, II, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MORTON GOLDFARB, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 5, 2010

Citations

No. 09 Civ. 7667 (RJS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2010)