From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moran v. Del Gaudio

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
Oct 30, 1952
202 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)

Opinion

10-30-1952

Joseph Moran et al., Respondents, v. Alphonse A. Del Gaudio, Appellant.


Harry Heller for appellant. Frank A. Barrera for respondents. FENNELLY, HOOLEY and WALSH, JJ., concur. Per Curiam. It was error to charge that damages might be awarded for inconvenience, mental anguish, pain and suffering, as well as punitive damages. These elements of damage are not within the contemplation of section 1444-a of the Civil Practice Act. Since the latter section creates a new statutory liability (David v. Fayman, 273 App. Div. 408, affd. 298 N.Y. 669), the same must be strictly construed (Leppard v. O'Brien, 225 App. Div. 162, 164, affd. 252 N.Y. 563). The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide the event. Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Moran v. Del Gaudio

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.
Oct 30, 1952
202 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)
Case details for

Moran v. Del Gaudio

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Moran et al., Respondents,v.Alphonse A. Del Gaudio, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

Date published: Oct 30, 1952

Citations

202 Misc. 760 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)