From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moralez v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 27, 2024
20-cv-07860 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-07860 BLF (PR)

08-27-2024

RUDOLPH MORALEZ, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding prison conditions, and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. No. 9. On September 24, 2021, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted after Plaintiff had been afforded two opportunities to amend and the deficiencies remained the same. Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff appealed the matter. Dkt. No. 31.

The Ninth Circuit has referred this matter back to this Court for the limited purpose of determining whether IFP status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. Dkt. No. 33. The Court finds that the appeal is frivolous since the dismissal was proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, Plaintiff's IFP status is REVOKED.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to Plaintiff as well as to the Ninth Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moralez v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 27, 2024
20-cv-07860 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Moralez v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH MORALEZ, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

20-cv-07860 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2024)