From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jan 13, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv356 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv356

01-13-2017

JOSE ROLANDO MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Jose Rolando Morales, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court.

The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning this case. The Magistrate Judge recommends the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court must therefore conduct a de novo review of the objections.

A federal criminal conviction may be challenged in a habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 only if the challenge is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision that establishes the petitioner was convicted of a nonexistent offense. Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Petitioner does not rely on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision. Moreover, he challenges the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction, rather than the conviction itself. As a result, his challenge may not be asserted in a petition filed pursuant to Section 2241. Ali v. Carvajal, 654 F. App'x 172, 172-73 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005)).

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

So Ordered and Signed

Jan 13, 2017

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Morales v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jan 13, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv356 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Morales v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ROLANDO MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv356 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2017)