From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Transcare N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-06257.

Decided April 19, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated May 8, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Jacobowitz, Garfinkel Lesman, New York, N.Y. (Fiedelman McGaw [Ross P. Masler] of counsel), for appellants.

Goldfarb Gerzog (Seligson, Rothman Rothman, New York, N.Y. [Martin S. Rothman, Ira D. Gerzog, and Alyne I. Diamond] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on the wet steps of a bus owned by the defendant Transcare New York, Inc., and driven by the defendant Jaime Reyes. The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). In support of their motion, the defendants submitted, inter alia, Reyes's deposition in which he testified that it was raining on the date of the accident, and that he parked the bus and left its doors open for 15-20 minutes before the plaintiff fell. Reyes also testified that he cleaned the bus on an as-needed basis, using soap and water to mop the bus and its steps. The defendants also submitted the plaintiff's deposition in which she testified that her coat became wet after its contact with the steps, and felt "soapy." The plaintiff also testified that Reyes told her that the condition of the steps was because they were cleaned. Thus, the defendants failed to meet their burden of submitting any evidence to refute the plaintiff's contention that they created the dangerous condition.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiff's papers ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., supra).

RITTER, J.P., H. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morales v. Transcare N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Morales v. Transcare N.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARCELINA MORALES, respondent, v. TRANSCARE NEW YORK, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 813

Citing Cases

Padovano v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

The deposition testimony of the plaintiff presented a triable issue of fact as to whether the metal bar was…