From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Robinson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
EDCV 23-00007 JAK (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

EDCV 23-00007 JAK (KS)

01-31-2024

JOSEPH WILLIAM MORALES, Petitioner, v. JAMES ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), the Motion to Dismiss the Petition, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“Objections”), and Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Objections. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Morales v. Robinson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
EDCV 23-00007 JAK (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Morales v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WILLIAM MORALES, Petitioner, v. JAMES ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

EDCV 23-00007 JAK (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)