From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Puk

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-01575-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01575-APG-BNW

01-06-2022

ERNESTO MORALES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTINE NOELLE PUK, an individual; DOES I through XX; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants. ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor.

CLEAR COUNSEL LAW GROUP Dustin E. Birch Jared R. Richards, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11254 Dustin E. Birch, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10517 ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO & MITCHELL Marissa R. Temple, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9028 Attorneys for Defendant Christina Noelle Puk RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. Troy A. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11361 Attorneys for Intervenor ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company Marissa R. Temple Troy A. Clark


CLEAR COUNSEL LAW GROUP

Dustin E. Birch

Jared R. Richards, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 11254

Dustin E. Birch, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 10517

ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO & MITCHELL

Marissa R. Temple, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 9028

Attorneys for Defendant Christina Noelle Puk

RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C.

Troy A. Clark, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 11361

Attorneys for Intervenor ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company

Marissa R. Temple

Troy A. Clark

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(e), the parties submit their proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Deadlines that fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday have been scheduled for the next judicial day.

1. Meeting :

Pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(f), a meeting was held on January 4, 2022, and was attended telephonically by Dustin E. Birch, Esq. of Clear Counsel Law Group for Plaintiff Ernesto Morales, Marissa Temple, Esq. of Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell on behalf of Defendant Christina Noelle Puk, and Troy A. Clark, Esq. of Resnick & Louis, P.C. on behalf of Intervenor ACUITY, A Mutual Insurance Company.

2. Pre-Discovery Disclosures :

Pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(a)(1), the parties will make their pre-discovery disclosures, including but not limited to any Computation(s) of Damages required pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(i)(A)(iii), on or before January 18, 2022.

3. Areas of Discovery :

The parties agree that the areas of discovery should include, but not be limited to: all claims and defenses allowed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

4. Discovery Plan :

The parties propose the following discovery plan:

A. Discovery Cut-off Date(s) :

Discovery will cutoff less than 360 days from the date of filing of the answer. An Answer was filed by Defendant Puk on June 17, 2021. The parties request that discovery close on June 13, 2022.

B. Amending the Pleadings and Adding Parties :

The parties shall have until March 11, 2022, to file any motions to amend the pleadings to add parties. This is 90 days before the discovery cut-off date.

C. FRCP 26(a)(2) Disclosure of Experts :

Proposed Expert Disclosure Schedule:

Disclosure of experts shall proceed according to FRCP Rule 26(a)(2) and LR 26-1(e)(3) as follows: the disclosure of experts and their reports shall occur on or before April 13, 2022. The disclosure of rebuttal experts and their reports shall occur on or before May 13, 2022. The initial expert disclosure deadline is 60 days before the discovery cut-off date and the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline is 30 days after the initial expert disclosure deadline.

Dispositive Motions :

The parties shall have until July 12, 2022, to file dispositive motions. This is 30 days after the discovery cut-off date, as required by LR 26-1(e)(4).

D. Pre-Trial Order :

The parties will prepare a Consolidated Pre-Trial Order on or before August 11, 2022, which is not more than 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions in the case, as required by LR 26-1(e)(5). This deadline will be suspended if dispositive motions are timely filed until 30 days after the decision of the dispositive motions or until further order of the Court. The disclosure required by FRCP Rule 26(a)(3), and objections thereto, shall be included in the pre-trial order.

E. Court Conferences :

If the Court has questions regarding the dates proposed by the parties, the parties request a conference with the Court before entry of the Scheduling Order. If the Court does not have questions, the parties do not request a conference with the Court.

F. Extensions or Modifications of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order :

LR 26-4 governs modifications or extensions of this Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Any stipulation or motion to extend a deadline set forth in the discovery plan and scheduling order must be made not later than 21 days before the subject deadline. Any stipulation or motion to extend the discovery cut-off period must be made no later than September 16, 2022, 21 days before the discovery cut-off date.

G. Format of Discovery :

Pursuant to the electronic discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure effective December 1, 2020, the parties addressed the e-discovery issues pertaining to the format of discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference. The parties do not anticipate discovery of native files or metadata at this time, but each party reserves the right to make a showing for the need of such electronic data as discovery progresses.

H. Alternative Dispute Resolution:

The parties certify that they have met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative dispute-resolution processes including mediation, arbitration, and if applicable, early neutral evaluation.

I. Alternative Forms of Case Disposition:

The parties certify that they considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. section 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 and the use of the Short Trial Program (General Order 2013-01), however, the parties have decided against such use and require a traditional jury trial.

J. Electronic Evidence:

The parties certify that they discussed whether they intend to present evidence in electronic format to jurors for the purposes of jury deliberations. The parties have not reached any stipulations in this regard at this time.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 8 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court grants the stipulation except the deadline to seek an extension or modification of discovery deadlines shall be March 11, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Morales v. Puk

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:21-cv-01575-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Morales v. Puk

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTO MORALES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTINE NOELLE PUK, an…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01575-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)