Morales v. Ocegueda

Full title: FRANCISCO MORALES, Petitioner, v. D. OCEGUEDA, LIEUTENANT, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

EDCV 11-802-PA (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

FRANCISCO MORALES, Petitioner, v. D. OCEGUEDA, LIEUTENANT, Respondent. No. EDCV 11-802-PA (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 13, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.